Sat Oct 14 21:56:45 UTC 2017
Time-block stuff (getting started late today)
| Time (PDT) | Intention | Revision 1 | Revision 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0000 | TV: We Bare Bears | ||
| 0030 | TV: Jeff Dunham | ||
| 0100 | SLEEP | ||
| 0130 | SLEEP | ||
| 0200 | SLEEP | ||
| 0230 | SLEEP | ||
| 0300 | SLEEP | ||
| 0330 | SLEEP | ||
| 0400 | SLEEP | ||
| 0430 | SLEEP | ||
| 0500 | SLEEP | ||
| 0530 | SLEEP | ||
| 0600 | SLEEP | ||
| 0630 | SLEEP | ||
| 0700 | SLEEP | ||
| 0730 | SLEEP | ||
| 0800 | SLEEP | ||
| 0830 | SLEEP | ||
| 0900 | SLEEP | ||
| 0930 | SLEEP | ||
| 1000 | SLEEP | ||
| 1030 | SLEEP | ||
| 1100 | SLEEP | ||
| 1130 | SLEEP | ||
| 1200 | Waking up | ||
| 1230 | Computer | ||
| 1300 | Walk to work | ||
| 1330 | Snack | ||
| 1400 | Seattle Indies Meetup | ||
| 1430 | Reading and talking | ||
| 1500 | Reading and talking | ||
| 1530 | Reading and talking | ||
| 1600 | Walk home | ||
| 1630 | Walk to Livio's | ||
| 1700 | Voltron | ||
| 1730 | Neo Yokio | ||
| 1800 | Random game | TV: Castlevania | |
| 1830 | Random game | TV: Castlevania | |
| 1900 | Buffer | TV: Castlevania | |
| 1930 | Buffer | TV: Castlevania | |
| 2000 | Buffer | TV: Lego Batman Movie | |
| 2030 | Buffer | TV: Lego Batman Movie | |
| 2100 | Buffer | TV: Lego Batman Movie | |
| 2130 | Walk home | TV: Lego Batman Movie | |
| 2200 | Gaming: PUBG | Walk home | |
| 2230 | Gaming: PUBG | Eating | |
| 2300 | Gaming: Overwatch | TV: We Bare Bears | |
| 2330 | Gaming: Overwatch | TV: We Bare Bears |
Sat Oct 14 22:05:04 UTC 2017
Reading a bit of "Basic Economics" at the Seattle Indies Meetup.
I already have a bunch of problems with the "Price Controls" chapter. The problem isn't that what he saying isn't true, the problem is him leaving out a bunch of details that make the whole situation a lot more complicated than it is.
For example, price controls are not just a government thing. People who own the supply can very well work towards price controls. This is the reason monopolies are bad. But I wonder if monopolies will ever be mentioned in this book at all.
I keep coming back to the lack of consideration of "leverage". I mean, I haven't read much of the book, but if leverage isn't ever brought up, I won't be surprised, and the book will be missing an important part of economics because of it.
And leverage is an important concept, because it's a part of how governments influence economies, and noting that leverage isn't only a tool of governments is an important means of considering why economies are fragile and need purposeful direction at times.